While looking through some concerns sent to SEJ after a recent webinar, 2 of them protruded to me as associated and comparable.
That implies you remain in for a reward, gentile reader, since today’s an unique 2-for-1 version of Ask an SEO.
Here are the concerns:
Ines asked: What do you do with old websites that have hundreds of URLs with really little traffic to most of them. Do you get rid of the bad content first? Just how much should I eliminate at a time? Is there a guideline? Should I take internal links into account?
Christina asked: Is it better to redirect old content to new material if that results in a redirect chain? Or should I just delete that content?
Let’s Talk About Old Content
There’s a lot to unload here, so let’s dive into it.
I’ll get my pet peeve out of the way initially: Ideally, you have dates on this old material, so that the readers who do stumble upon it know that it’s old and out-of-date.
There are a couple of approaches you can take here, and a lot of it depends upon your keyword research and information.
The very first concern I ‘d ask myself for any piece of material is: Is this helpful? Or is it harmful (out of date, bad guidance, no longer appropriate, and so on)?
If it’s hazardous or no longer pertinent, like a blog post on how to grow your Google+ following, you can simply go on and erase it. There’s nothing pertinent to redirect it to.
If it works, you’re entrusted to a few choices:
- Re-write it or combine it with other content to see if you can get more traffic to it.
- If you currently have actually more updated or more pertinent content, proceed and 301 redirect it to that content.
- If it no longer applies to your site or company, go on and delete it.
A lot of SEO pros will inform you that if it used to be an incredibly popular piece with great deals of external links you ought to 301 it to protect those links.
I’ll tell you to either figure out why it’s no longer extremely popular and update it or keep it up for historical functions. It’s fantastic just how much of the “old” web no longer exists.
The secret here is to figure out why the content isn’t popular.
When you do that you can follow the below recommendations:
– Does it resolve a user requirement but is just bad quality? Re-write it.
– Is it no longer relevant/useful? Delete it.
– Exists more recent or better material somewhere else? Redirect it.
– Should I maintain it for historical reasons? Or exists simply little volume for that now, however I’m still getting traffic? Leave it alone.
OK, Now Let’s Speak about Redirects
Reroute chains get a great deal of bad press in SEO.
There used to be a ton of dispute about whether they pass PageRank, just how much PageRank they pass, just how much decays, the number of Google will follow, and so on.
For 99.9999925% of individuals, none of that matters.
If these are things we need to fret about, they’re so minimal that they don’t have much of an effect. The fact is Google will follow redirects and will pass some “value” through them.
There’s no negative effect or charge from having redirect chains but go for not more than five hops as Google might drop from following the redirects.
Sure, they aren’t perfect. They will add a couple of milliseconds of load time for your page, and they might not send 100% of the PageRank worth through to the location, however all that is minimal and, truthfully, over-thinking SEO.
When deciding if you should redirect or delete content, utilize the rubric above.
And as a best practice, if you have redirect chains, bring them to a minimal by updating redirects to point directly to the last destination.
For example, if you have A-> B-> C (one redirect chain), produce A-> C and B-> C (2 redirects) instead.
Hope this assists.
Have a question about SEO? Submit via this kind.
Included Image: ANDRANIK HAKOBYAN/SMM Panel